The remarkable Montreal Protocol may just have delayed an ice-free arctic
The United Nations treaty aimed at safeguarding the Earth and its inhabitants from dangerous ultraviolet radiation.
Unbeknownst at the time, this historic treaty, ratified by every country, has had far-reaching implications for the global climate. It was designed to combat the depletion of the ozone layer by reducing the presence of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs), commonly found in products like refrigerators, air conditioners, and aerosols.
Over the past five decades, the Montreal Protocol has played a significant role in mitigating various aspects of the global climate crisis.
Subscribe to the hussh newsletter
Exciting new research conducted by climate scientists from Columbia Engineering and the University of Exeter reveals that the impact of the Montreal Protocol extends even further—to the Arctic region.
Their study, published in PNAS, demonstrates that the implementation of the treaty is effectively delaying the onset of the first ice-free Arctic summer by as much as 15 years, depending on future emission patterns. This unexpected finding underscores the immediate and tangible results achieved by a successful climate treaty, debunking the notion that its benefits lie in some distant future.
Arctic sea ice loss, a prominent and undeniable signal of anthropogenic climate change, has been alarmingly rapid. While projections indicate that the first ice-free Arctic summer is likely to occur by 2050, largely due to increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the study reveals that other factors have also contributed to this phenomenon. Specifically, ozone-depleting substances have played a noteworthy role in the loss of Arctic sea ice. However, when these substances came under strict regulation following the enactment of the Montreal Protocol in the late 1980s, their atmospheric concentrations began to decline in the mid-1990s.
In their study, the researchers found that by comparing the estimated warming with and without the Montreal Protocol under different emissions scenarios from 1985 to 2050, the treaty’s enactment has resulted in a global mean surface temperature that is approximately 0.5 °C cooler and an Arctic polar cap that is nearly 1 °C cooler by 2050.
What makes this climate mitigation particularly significant is that it stems solely from the reduced warming caused by regulated ozone-depleting substances, as the prevention of stratospheric ozone losses played no part in the observed effects. While these substances may be less prevalent than carbon dioxide, their potent warming impact, especially in the Arctic region, has been a major driver of climate change in the latter half of the 20th century.
Though not the primary aim of the Montreal Protocol, the unexpected positive consequences in terms of mitigating Arctic climate change underscore the importance of addressing diverse factors in the fight against global warming.
Since the mid-1990s, the Montreal Protocol has achieved considerable success in reducing atmospheric concentrations of ozone-depleting substances, leading to signs of healing in the ozone layer. However, recent research suggests a slight increase in ODS concentrations from 2010 to 2020, highlighting the need for continued vigilance.
To ensure the continued effectiveness of the Montreal Protocol and its role in combating climate change, it is imperative that we remain vigilant and actively monitor the state of ozone-depleting substances to prevent any setbacks in the progress achieved thus far.

Beyond promises: Why climate pledges aren’t enough to prevent catastrophe

Giving land back to the sea is restoring nature’s defenses in the UK

Britain to finally turn its back on coal with the Ratcliffe shutdown
