Outsourcing emissions reductions: Are carbon credits back in favour?
In a renewed effort to combat climate change, Amazon, alongside other multinational companies, has committed to purchasing carbon offset credits to help preserve the Amazon rainforest.
The initiative, valued at approximately $180 million, will support the Brazilian state of Pará, home to the world’s largest rainforest, which is critical for absorbing vast amounts of greenhouse gases.
This comes at a time when the effectiveness and ethics of carbon credits are under increasing scrutiny, raising questions about whether this is the best path forward in the fight against climate change.
Subscribe to the hussh newsletter
The Push to Offset Carbon Emissions
The carbon credit market allows companies and countries to offset their carbon emissions by funding projects that reduce or capture greenhouse gases elsewhere, such as through reforestation or renewable energy. In this case, Amazon and other firms are buying credits through the LEAF Coalition, an international initiative established in 2021 to support forest conservation. The coalition, which includes the United States and the United Kingdom, focuses on protecting tropical forests and helping nations reduce their carbon footprints.
This marks LEAF's first major deal in the Amazon, where the rainforest plays a crucial role in the global climate by acting as a massive carbon sink. The project also comes at a critical moment for Brazil, as the country seeks to rebuild its environmental reputation after years of soaring deforestation.
While the initiative appears to be a win for the environment, the wider debate around the value and legitimacy of carbon credits remains unresolved.
Carbon Credits: A Troubled History
The carbon credit market has faced a series of setbacks in recent years. Once a $1.9 billion industry, the market shrank dramatically to $723 million in the past year amid growing concerns about the efficacy of offset projects. Many critics argue that companies are using carbon credits as a way to avoid making meaningful reductions in their own emissions, essentially paying to "greenwash" their environmental impact without addressing the root causes.
Furthermore, there have been accusations of fraud and manipulation within the carbon credit market, with some projects failing to deliver promised emissions reductions or even exacerbating environmental issues. The credibility of such initiatives has been called into question, and the collapse in the market reflects these mounting concerns.
However, despite the controversy, the demand for carbon credits is making a comeback. With major corporations, especially in tech, under immense pressure to cut their carbon footprint and address the rising emissions linked to artificial intelligence and data storage, carbon offsets have regained popularity. Tech giants like Microsoft, Meta, and Google have all purchased carbon credits in Brazil this year.
The $180 Million Amazon Deal
Amazon, along with companies like Bayer, H&M, BCG, Capgemini, and the Walmart Foundation, has committed to purchasing 5 million carbon credits through the LEAF Coalition. Priced at $15 per credit—far above the market average of $4.49 for nature-based credits—each credit represents the reduction of one metric ton of carbon emissions, achieved by curbing deforestation in Pará between 2023 and 2026.
In addition to the 5 million credits already sold, another 7 million credits will be available for other companies to purchase. Should those credits go unsold, the governments of the United States, United Kingdom, and Norway have guaranteed to buy the remaining portion, ensuring that the project moves forward regardless of private sector interest.
This influx of corporate funding is seen as a positive step for Brazil’s environmental efforts, especially in light of next year’s UN COP30 climate summit, which will be hosted in Pará. However, given the history of the carbon credit market, some question whether these financial commitments will result in meaningful environmental change or merely provide corporations with an easy way to maintain their current levels of emissions while appearing environmentally responsible.
Shifting the Narrative: What About Local Communities?
One notable aspect of this initiative is its focus on supporting the communities within the Amazon. Governor Helder Barbalho of Pará has emphasized that much of the revenue from carbon credit sales will go directly to Indigenous peoples, descendants of former slaves, traditional extractivist communities, and small-scale family farms. These groups have long been custodians of the forest, practicing sustainable living that has helped protect this vital ecosystem for generations.
While the state will retain a portion of the funds for its emissions-reduction programs, the allocation of resources to these local communities is a critical component of the project. It signals a growing recognition of the importance of involving Indigenous and local groups in climate action, given their deep connection to the land and their historical role in preserving it.
Carbon Credits: A Long-Term Solution or a Short-Term Fix?
Despite the symbolic importance of Amazon’s involvement in this deal—given the company's global prominence and direct association with the region’s name—the larger question remains: are carbon credits a sustainable solution, or are they simply a band-aid for a much bigger problem?
Critics argue that while carbon credits can offer short-term financial incentives for conservation, they do not address the root causes of deforestation or climate change. Instead, they can sometimes allow businesses to continue their environmentally damaging practices without making substantial changes to their operations.
The collapse of the carbon credit market from $1.9 billion to $723 million in recent years highlights the fragility and uncertainty of this approach. With accusations of fraud and manipulation, there are real concerns about whether these projects can deliver on their promises of emissions reductions.
On the other hand, proponents argue that carbon credits offer a pragmatic way to channel resources into conservation efforts, particularly in regions like the Amazon where immediate action is needed. By creating financial incentives for reducing deforestation, they argue, such projects can help protect vital ecosystems while buying time for longer-term solutions to take effect.
COP30 and Brazil’s Environmental Commitment
The timing of this deal could not be more significant for Brazil. As the host of COP30 in 2025, Brazil is eager to restore its environmental credibility on the global stage after years of rampant deforestation. Under President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, the country has set ambitious targets to reduce deforestation and promote sustainability, with projects like the LEAF Coalition’s carbon credits playing a key role in these efforts.
Pará, which has seen the highest rates of deforestation since 2005, has made notable progress in recent years. Preliminary government data shows that deforestation in the state has fallen by 20% in 2023 compared to the previous year. Nevertheless, the challenges remain immense, with vast areas of forest still being cleared for agriculture, particularly for cattle ranching.
To address this issue, Governor Barbalho announced during Climate Week that by 2026, Pará will have full traceability of its cattle supply chains. This initiative is aimed at reducing the environmental impact of the cattle industry, a major driver of deforestation in the region.
The Role of Corporations in Climate Action
As companies like Amazon, Bayer, and others continue to invest in carbon credits, the role of corporations in addressing climate change becomes increasingly central. While some question whether these initiatives represent genuine progress or merely provide a convenient way for companies to offset their environmental impact without making meaningful changes, the fact remains that private sector involvement is critical to the success of global climate efforts.
By supporting projects that reduce deforestation and promote sustainable development, companies can play a key role in mitigating climate change. However, for these efforts to be truly effective, they must be accompanied by deeper systemic changes—both within the companies themselves and in the broader global economy.
As the world looks ahead to COP30, the hope is that projects like the LEAF Coalition’s carbon credit initiative will serve as a model for how corporations, governments, and local communities can work together to protect the planet’s most vital ecosystems and chart a path toward a more sustainable future.